#8973. The pros and cons of bifactor models for testing dimensionality and psychopathological models: A commentary on the manuscript “A systematic review and meta-analytic factor analysis of the depression anxiety stress scales”

August 2026publication date
Proposal available till 29-05-2025
4 total number of authors per manuscript3000 $

The title of the journal is available only for the authors who have already paid for
Journal’s subject area:
Clinical Psychology;
Places in the authors’ list:
place 1place 2place 3place 4
FreeFreeFreeFree
900 $800 $700 $600 $
Contract №8973.1 Contract №8973.2 Contract №8973.3 Contract №8973.4
1 place - free (for sale)
2 place - free (for sale)
3 place - free (for sale)
4 place - free (for sale)

Abstract:
Yeung et al. (2020) imply that a bifactor structure provides the most robust structural validity for the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales (DASS) measures. In this study, we explore the clinical utility of the bifactor model of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales.
Keywords:
Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales; psychopathological model; dimensionality assessment; bifactor models

Contacts :
0