LogIn / RegistrationArticles for sale
- Head office address: Moscow, 123317, Moscow City, 8th Floor, Presnenskaya Embankment, 6, bldg. 2
- article@123mi.ru
- Сортировка:
- по горящим
- по цене
- по дате
#8327. A systematic review of tools designed for teacher proxy-report of children’s physical literacy or constituting elements
| November 2025 | publication date |
| Proposal available till | 14-06-2025 |
| 4 total number of authors per manuscript | 5500 $ |
| The title of the journal is available only for the authors who have already paid for |
| Journal’s subject area: |
| Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation; Nutrition and Dietetics; Medicine (miscellaneous); |
| place 1 | place 2 | place 3 | place 4 |
| Sold out | Free | Free | Sold out |
| 2350 $ | 1200 $ | 1050 $ | 900 $ |
| №8327.1 | Contract №8327.2   | Contract №8327.3 | №8327.4 |
1 place - sold out (contract 7718)
2 place - free (for sale)
3 place - free (for sale)
4 place - sold out
More details about the manuscript: Science Citation Index Expanded or/and Social Sciences Citation Index
Abstract:
Background: Physical literacy (PL) in childhood is essential for a healthy active lifestyle, with teachers playing a critical role in guiding its development. Teachers can assist children to acquire the skills, confidence, and creativity required to perform diverse movements and physical activities. However, to detect and directly intervene on the aspects of children’s PL that are suboptimal, teachers require valid and reliable measures. This systematic review critically evaluates the psychometric properties of teacher proxy-report instruments for assessing one or more of the 30 elements within the four domains (physical, psychological, cognitive, social) of the Australian Physical Literacy Framework (APLF), in children aged 5–12 years. Secondary aims were to: examine alignment of each measure (and relevant items) with the APLF and provide recommendations for teachers in assessing PL. Methods: Seven electronic databases (Academic Search Complete, CINAHL Complete, Education Source, Global Health, MEDLINE Complete, PsycINFO, and SPORTDiscus) were systematically searched originally in October 20XX, with an updated search in April 20XX. Eligible studies were peer-reviewed English language publications that sampled a population of children with mean age between 5 and 12 years and focused on developing and evaluating at least one psychometric property of a teacher proxy-report instrument for assessing one or more of the 30 APLF elements. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidance was followed for the conduct and reporting of this review. The methodological quality of included studies and quality of psychometric properties of identified tools were evaluated using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidance. Alignment of each measure (and relevant items) with the APLF domains and 30 elements was appraised.
Keywords:
Assessment; Child; COSMIN; Measurement; Physical literacy; Psychometrics; Systematic review
Contacts :
2 place - free (for sale)
3 place - free (for sale)
4 place - sold out
More details about the manuscript: Science Citation Index Expanded or/and Social Sciences Citation Index
Abstract:
Background: Physical literacy (PL) in childhood is essential for a healthy active lifestyle, with teachers playing a critical role in guiding its development. Teachers can assist children to acquire the skills, confidence, and creativity required to perform diverse movements and physical activities. However, to detect and directly intervene on the aspects of children’s PL that are suboptimal, teachers require valid and reliable measures. This systematic review critically evaluates the psychometric properties of teacher proxy-report instruments for assessing one or more of the 30 elements within the four domains (physical, psychological, cognitive, social) of the Australian Physical Literacy Framework (APLF), in children aged 5–12 years. Secondary aims were to: examine alignment of each measure (and relevant items) with the APLF and provide recommendations for teachers in assessing PL. Methods: Seven electronic databases (Academic Search Complete, CINAHL Complete, Education Source, Global Health, MEDLINE Complete, PsycINFO, and SPORTDiscus) were systematically searched originally in October 20XX, with an updated search in April 20XX. Eligible studies were peer-reviewed English language publications that sampled a population of children with mean age between 5 and 12 years and focused on developing and evaluating at least one psychometric property of a teacher proxy-report instrument for assessing one or more of the 30 APLF elements. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidance was followed for the conduct and reporting of this review. The methodological quality of included studies and quality of psychometric properties of identified tools were evaluated using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidance. Alignment of each measure (and relevant items) with the APLF domains and 30 elements was appraised.
Keywords:
Assessment; Child; COSMIN; Measurement; Physical literacy; Psychometrics; Systematic review
Contacts :
