#5377. Who is to blame for the terrorist attack? Comparison of content analysis and survey data as sources of responsibility ascriptions

August 2026publication date
Proposal available till 13-05-2025
4 total number of authors per manuscript0 $

The title of the journal is available only for the authors who have already paid for
Journal’s subject area:
Social Sciences (all);
Engineering (all);
Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality;
Strategy and Management;
Places in the authors’ list:
place 1place 2place 3place 4
FreeFreeFreeFree
2350 $1200 $1050 $900 $
Contract5377.1 Contract5377.2 Contract5377.3 Contract5377.4
1 place - free (for sale)
2 place - free (for sale)
3 place - free (for sale)
4 place - free (for sale)

Abstract:
There is a growing body of research that uses different content analysis techniques to study risk and related issues. In this article, we focused on the question of how analysis of textual data relates to individual judgments, specifically responsibility ascriptions after the case of a terrorist attack. Our methodological goal was to assess the agreement between the results obtained via unobtrusive methods and evaluations extracted from survey data. Our substantive goal was to examine the specificity of responsibility attributions in the situation of a terrorist attack based on manual content analyses of blog posts.
Keywords:
blame and responsibility judgment; Content analysis; risk; terrorist attack; unobtrusive data

Contacts :
0