#4314. The Porter and the Jesuits: Macbeth and the Forgotten History of Equivocation?

September 2026publication date
Proposal available till 03-06-2025
4 total number of authors per manuscript0 $

The title of the journal is available only for the authors who have already paid for
Journal’s subject area:
Literature and Literary Theory;
Visual Arts and Performing Arts;
Religious Studies;
History;
Cultural Studies;
Places in the authors’ list:
place 1place 2place 3place 4
FreeFreeFreeFree
2510 $1340 $1170 $1000 $
Contract №4314.1 Contract №4314.2 Contract №4314.3 Contract №4314.4
1 place - free (for sale)
2 place - free (for sale)
3 place - free (for sale)
4 place - free (for sale)

More details about the manuscript: Arts & Humanities Citation Index or/and Social Sciences Citation Index
Abstract:
This essay explores Shakespeare’s relationship to the intellectual history of equivocation in sixteenth and seventeenth-century rhetoric and dialectic. It demonstrates that ‘equivocation’, far from denoting only a Jesuitical practice of deception, had a long and complex history intrinsically linked to theories of interpretation. The widely presumed influence of the conspirators’ trials on the play, based largely on verbal parallels with sermons, speeches and treatises, sidelines a fundamental sixteenth-century discourse about epistemology. The essay offers a historicized understanding of equivocation to demonstrate that the concept had permeated early modern culture more deeply and earlier than usually acknowledged. The rhetorical and dialectical tradition reveals a culture that was deeply disconcerted by what was perceived as the inherent instability of meaning. The essay argues that the theological-political controversy about equivocation was a debate about language and interpretation in which Shakespeare’s characters had participated before 1605.
Keywords:
ambiguity; history of rhetoric and dialectic; theological controversy

Contacts :
0