#4127. How are words with diacritical vowels represented in the mental lexicon? Evidence from Spanish and German

September 2026publication date
Proposal available till 24-05-2025
4 total number of authors per manuscript0 $

The title of the journal is available only for the authors who have already paid for
Journal’s subject area:
Language and Linguistics;
Linguistics and Language;
Experimental and Cognitive Psychology;
Cognitive Neuroscience;
Places in the authors’ list:
place 1place 2place 3place 4
FreeFreeFreeFree
2350 $1200 $1050 $900 $
Contract №4127.1 Contract №4127.2 Contract №4127.3 Contract №4127.4
1 place - free (for sale)
2 place - free (for sale)
3 place - free (for sale)
4 place - free (for sale)

Abstract:
Recent research has shown that the omission of diacritics in words does not affect the initial contact with the lexical entries, as measured by masked priming. In the present study, we directly examined whether diacritics’ omission slows down lexical access using a single-presentation semantic categorisation task (“is the word an animal name?”). We did so in a language in which diacritics reflect lexical stress but not vowel quality and in a language in which diacritics reflect vowel quality but not lexical stress. In Spanish, word response times were similar for words with diacritics that were either present or omitted. In contrast, German words were responded more slowly when the words’ diacritics were omitted. Thus, the function of diacritics in each language determines how words with diacritics are represented in the mental lexicon.
Keywords:
cross-language differences; lexical access; modelling; Word recognition

Contacts :
0