#3909. Considering the updated Input Hypothesis from a neurolinguistic perspective: A response to Lichtman and VanPatten
September 2026 | publication date |
Proposal available till | 14-05-2025 |
4 total number of authors per manuscript | 0 $ |
The title of the journal is available only for the authors who have already paid for |
|
|
Journal’s subject area: |
Linguistics and Language; |
Places in the authors’ list:
1 place - free (for sale)
2 place - free (for sale)
3 place - free (for sale)
4 place - free (for sale)
Abstract:
We used event-related potentials to investigate the time course and distribution of brain activity while adults performed (1) a sequential learning task involving complex structured sequences and (2) a language processing task. These results are interpreted as an indication that an index of violations and the cost of integration of expectations for upcoming material when processing complex sequential structure. The research concludes that the same neural mechanisms may be recruited for both syntactic processing of linguistic stimuli and sequential learning of structured sequence patterns more generally.
Keywords:
event-related potentials; functional magnetic resonance imaging; input hypothesis; neurolinguistics; second language acquisition
Contacts :