#3829. Designing Critical Questions for Argumentation Schemes

September 2026publication date
Proposal available till 11-05-2025
4 total number of authors per manuscript0 $

The title of the journal is available only for the authors who have already paid for
Journal’s subject area:
Philosophy;
Linguistics and Language;
Places in the authors’ list:
place 1place 2place 3place 4
FreeFreeFreeFree
2510 $1340 $1170 $1000 $
Contract №3829.1 Contract №3829.2 Contract №3829.3 Contract №3829.4
1 place - free (for sale)
2 place - free (for sale)
3 place - free (for sale)
4 place - free (for sale)

More details about the manuscript: Arts & Humanities Citation Index or/and Social Sciences Citation Index
Abstract:
This research offers insights into the nature and design of critical questions as they are found in argumentation schemes. These include a discussion of their evaluative function, their relationship with the patterns of reasoning they accompany, as well as the differing formulations of critical questions currently on offer. Critical questions should be closely paired with individual premises in the accompanying pattern of reasoning and be open-ended. Doing so allows the roles of raising considerations relevant for the reasoning and scrutinizing those considerations to be clearly distinguished. The author offers a positive methodological proposal for the construction of questions and premises that aims at overcoming a number of the individual and systematic shortcomings of extant question styles.
Keywords:
Argument evaluation; Argumentation schemes; Critical questions; Patterns of reasoning

Contacts :
0