#3714. Individual and collaborative processing of written corrective feedback affects second language writing accuracy and revision

October 2026publication date
Proposal available till 07-06-2025
4 total number of authors per manuscript0 $

The title of the journal is available only for the authors who have already paid for
Journal’s subject area:
Language and Linguistics;
Linguistics and Language;
Education;
Places in the authors’ list:
place 1place 2place 3place 4
FreeFreeFreeFree
2350 $1200 $1050 $900 $
Contract №3714.1 Contract №3714.2 Contract №3714.3 Contract №3714.4
1 place - free (for sale)
2 place - free (for sale)
3 place - free (for sale)
4 place - free (for sale)

Abstract:
Although substantial evidence exists showing written corrective feedback (WCF) helps second language (L2) learners improve their writing accuracy, there is a paucity of research that has examined L2 writing accuracy in connection with both revision behavior and processing of WCF. The participants completed four timed writing tasks and received indirect WCF from a course teacher that used different error codes to target nine error types. The participants processed the WCF individually or collaboratively before revising. The results showed the collaborative processing groups performance in terms of resolved, unresolved, and abandoned errors was superior to the individual processing group. The results are discussed in terms of the importance of L2 writing teachers’ pedagogical practices.
Keywords:
Collaborative processing; Individual processing; L2 writing; Writing accuracy; Written corrective feedback

Contacts :
0