#3676. Humour and (mock) aggression: Distinguishing cyberbullying from roasting

May 2027publication date
Proposal available till 28-05-2025
4 total number of authors per manuscript0 $

The title of the journal is available only for the authors who have already paid for
Journal’s subject area:
Language and Linguistics;
Linguistics and Language;
Communication;
Social Psychology;
Experimental and Cognitive Psychology;
Places in the authors’ list:
place 1place 2place 3place 4
FreeFreeFreeFree
2350 $1200 $1050 $900 $
Contract №3676.1 Contract №3676.2 Contract №3676.3 Contract №3676.4
1 place - free (for sale)
2 place - free (for sale)
3 place - free (for sale)
4 place - free (for sale)

More details about the manuscript: Science Citation Index Expanded or/and Social Sciences Citation Index
Abstract:
The research postulates a distinction between two types of discursive aggression in the context of humour production. The study of emic (community members) and etic (outsiders) metapragmatic evaluations of the content on the subreddit yields divergent insider/outsider interpretations of the practice at hand; it also uncovers some ambivalence in the polysemous folk concepts of roasting and cyberbullying and the relationship between them. The points of convergence between humour and aggression are surveyed. First, mock aggression underlies benevolent humour (typified by roasting proper); second, genuine aggression (exemplified by cyberbullying proper) may amuse individuals other than the target of discursive aggression.
Keywords:
Cyberbullying; Discursive aggression; Emic/etic label; Metapragmatics; Online community of practice; Roasting

Contacts :
0