#3517. Evidence for multiple sources of inductive potential: Occupations and their relations to social institutions
October 2026 | publication date |
Proposal available till | 30-05-2025 |
4 total number of authors per manuscript | 0 $ |
The title of the journal is available only for the authors who have already paid for |
|
|
Journal’s subject area: |
Linguistics and Language;
Developmental and Educational Psychology;
Experimental and Cognitive Psychology;
Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology;
Artificial Intelligence; |
Places in the authors’ list:
1 place - free (for sale)
2 place - free (for sale)
3 place - free (for sale)
4 place - free (for sale)
Abstract:
Several current theories have essences as primary drivers of inductive potential. We investigated the possibility that people take occupational roles as having robust inductive potential. Participants used occupational roles to robustly generalize rights and obligations, functional behaviors, personality traits, and skills. Occupational roles supported inferences to the same extent as animal categories. We examined why members of occupational roles share properties. Participants did not attribute the inductive potential of occupational roles to essences, they attributed it to social institutions. In combination, these seven studies demonstrate that any theory of inductive potential must pluralistically allow for both essences and social institutions to form the basis of inductive potential.
Keywords:
Categories; Concepts; Inductive potential; Social cognition; Social roles
Contacts :