#3255. Psycholinguistic effects, types of impairments and processing levels in word production: Can we reduce confusions?: A commentary to Mailend, Maas, Beeson, Story & Forster (20XX)

October 2026publication date
Proposal available till 15-05-2025
4 total number of authors per manuscript0 $

The title of the journal is available only for the authors who have already paid for
Journal’s subject area:
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous);
Developmental and Educational Psychology;
Experimental and Cognitive Psychology;
Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology;
Cognitive Neuroscience;
Places in the authors’ list:
place 1place 2place 3place 4
FreeFreeFreeFree
2350 $1200 $1050 $900 $
Contract №3255.1 Contract №3255.2 Contract №3255.3 Contract №3255.4
1 place - free (for sale)
2 place - free (for sale)
3 place - free (for sale)
4 place - free (for sale)

More details about the manuscript: Science Citation Index Expanded OR/AND Social Sciences Citation Index
Abstract:
Three common difficulties faced by the literature that aims to specify models of speech production include: (1) difficulties with theoretical assumptions which link psycholinguistic effects unequivocally to one processing level; (2) difficulties using clinical classifications to localize experimental effects; (3) difficulties making theoretical inferences given the controversial nature of the representations that characterize different processing levels. We argue that these three types of difficulties could be ameliorated by studies in which the level of psycholinguistic effects is demonstrated with converging analyses, clinical classification is not taken as a starting point in studies investigating the nature of an impairment, the nature of processing levels associated with deficits is made clear and results are not over-interpreted.
Keywords:
Apraxia of speech; methodological issues, diagnosis, phonological errors, phonological interference

Contacts :
0