Articles for sale

#3221. Monetary incentives have only limited effects on auditory distraction: evidence for the automaticity of cross-modal attention capture

October 2026	publication date
Proposal available till	12-05-2025
4 total number of authors per manuscript	0 $

The title of the journal is available only for the authors who have already paid for

Journal’s subject area:

Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous); Developmental and Educational Psychology; Experimental and Cognitive Psychology;

Places in the authors’ list:

place 1	place 2	place 3	place 4
Free	Free	Free	Free
2350 $	1200 $	1050 $	900 $
Contract №3221.1	Contract №3221.2	Contract №3221.3	Contract №3221.4

1 place - free (for sale)
2 place - free (for sale)
3 place - free (for sale)
4 place - free (for sale)

More details about the manuscript: Science Citation Index Expanded OR/AND Social Sciences Citation Index
Abstract:
While the interference-by-process component of auditory distraction is postulated to be automatic and independent of cognitive control, the stimulus-aspecific attention capture by auditory deviants and the stimulus-specific attentional diversion by auditorily presented distractor sentences should be suppressed by increased task engagement. In Experiment 2, increased task engagement was associated with a small decrease of distraction relative to a quiet condition, but strong effects of auditory distraction on performance. Most importantly, and in contrast to the predictions of the duplex-mechanism account, the effects of stimulus-aspecific attention capture (Experiment 1) and stimulus-specific attentional diversion (Experiment 2) remained unaffected by incentive-induced changes in task engagement. Only the processes responsible for the deliberate memorization of the target items are dependent on controlled mental effort.
Keywords:
stimulus-specific attentional diversion;cross-modal attention capture;

Contacts :