#2286. A House Divided against Itself. The Intra-institutional Conflict about the Powers of the European Parliament

September 2026publication date
Proposal available till 30-05-2025
5 total number of authors per manuscript3530 $

The title of the journal is available only for the authors who have already paid for
Journal’s subject area:
Political Science and International Relations;
Business and International Management;
Places in the authors’ list:
place 1place 2place 3place 4place 5
FreeFreeFreeFreeFree
860 $780 $710 $630 $550 $
Contract №2286.1 Contract №2286.2 Contract №2286.3 Contract №2286.4 Contract №2286.5
1 place - free (for sale)
2 place - free (for sale)
3 place - free (for sale)
4 place - free (for sale)
5 place - free (for sale)

Abstract:
Many authors suggest that MEPs seek to extend the power of the EP in their daily parliamentary work. A central assumption in this literature is that the EP is a unitary actor that desires more power for itself. In other words, scholars assume that the conflict over the power of the EP is inter-institutional and not intra-institutional. In this article we seek to test this idea. Informed by the history of the parliamentarization of Europes national parliaments, we argue that the conflict about the power of the EP is likely to have an intra-institutional component. An empirical analysis of voting in the EP supports this notion. We find that the question of how much power the EP should have is as important as the question of how much power the EU should have in understanding how MEPs vote.
Keywords:
European Parliament; legislative behaviour; Parliamentarization; parliamentary voting

Contacts :
0