#12241. Ethically important moments – a pragmatic-dualist research ethics: A pragmatic-dualist research ethics

August 2026publication date
Proposal available till 04-06-2025
4 total number of authors per manuscript0 $

The title of the journal is available only for the authors who have already paid for
Journal’s subject area:
Philosophy;
Sociology and Political Science;
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous);
Education;
Places in the authors’ list:
place 1place 2place 3place 4
FreeFreeFreeFree
2510 $1340 $1170 $1000 $
Contract №12241.1 Contract №12241.2 Contract №12241.3 Contract №12241.4
1 place - free (for sale)
2 place - free (for sale)
3 place - free (for sale)
4 place - free (for sale)

More details about the manuscript: Arts & Humanities Citation Index or/and Social Sciences Citation Index
Abstract:
This article analyses dilemmas, ambivalences, and problematic issues related to research ethics by making a distinction between procedural research ethics and particularistic research ethics. Such a distinction reflects a theoretical construction and generalization. In practice, there can be a very close correlation between the two types. In the following, the distinction will therefore be used as a starting point for the presentation of a pragmatic-dualist research ethics. The approach is dualist because it draws on the presence of two independent, contrasting understandings, which are essentially different yet equal aspects of good research ethics; it is pragmatic because this dualism is structural and institutional by nature, and designed with an eye to what can realistically and expediently be done in practice. Thus the intention of the article is to both analyze and discuss two different understandings of research ethics and simultaneously qualify research ethics that draws on both of these understandings.
Keywords:
Particularistic; Pragmatic-dualist; Procedural; Research ethics

Contacts :
0