#4636. Anti-counterfeiting strategy unfolded: A closer look to the case of a large multinational manufacturer

August 2026publication date
Proposal available till 20-06-2025
4 total number of authors per manuscript0 $

The title of the journal is available only for the authors who have already paid for
Journal’s subject area:
Strategy and Management;
Business and International Management;
Places in the authors’ list:
place 1place 2place 3place 4
FreeFreeFreeFree
2350 $1200 $1050 $900 $
Contract №4636.1 Contract №4636.2 Contract №4636.3 Contract №4636.4
1 place - free (for sale)
2 place - free (for sale)
3 place - free (for sale)
4 place - free (for sale)

Abstract:
We examine in detail how one large mobile phone manufacturer develops its anti-counterfeit strategy and seizes counterfeit products on the market. We couple qualitative data (observations from 150 counterfeit sales points worldwide, two focus groups, a survey with 151 respondents, interviews with 90 informants) with econometric analysis of 3,333 fights the focal firm undertook against more than 2,000 counterfeiters in 75 countries over 6 years (20XX–20XX). We focus on firms seizure of counterfeit products when consumers safety is at risk. As the firm is more sensitive to product safety than counterfeiters, we found that the firm generally performs larger seizures when unsafe products are involved, but this is less true in the firms main market, likely because higher profitability offers higher incentives to counterfeiters. In companies fight against counterfeiters, product safety plays a pivotal role. Results show that larger seizures occur in the ancillary rather than in the mobile phone market because while authentic companies have high incentives to seize mobile phone and accessories, as both involve safety risks, counterfeiters have a greater incentive in the main market and thus put less effort in ancillary markets.
Keywords:
counterfeit; intellectual property right; mobile phone; product safety

Contacts :
0